Actual Problems of the Theory of Civil Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17605/wos.v3i2.35Keywords:
theoretical and methodological framework, dogma of law, the general theory of civil law, civil law system, the legal nature of the legal definitionsAbstract
The article focuses on the pressing issues surrounding the theoretical framework of civil rights in Russia. The authors conduct a thorough examination of the challenges stemming from the inadequately developed general theory of civil law, which they argue is indicative of the inherent weaknesses within the contemporary jurisprudential landscape. Through a meticulous analysis, the article aims to shed light on the implications of these deficiencies and their impact on the theoretical and methodological foundations of legal discourse in Russia. By elucidating these critical issues, the authors endeavor to stimulate scholarly dialogue and propose potential avenues for addressing the identified shortcomings, thereby contributing to the advancement of legal scholarship in the field of civil rights.
References
D. I. Stepanov, “Questions of methodology of civil doctrine,” in Actual problems of civil law: collection of articles, vol. 6, O. Y. Shilokhvost, Ed., Moscow, 2003, p. 1.
B. M. Gongalo, Thoughts and speeches about the science of civil law, vol. 2. Moscow, 2002.
M. I. Braginsky and V. V. Vitryansky, Contractual law: General provisions. Moscow, 1997.
Various authors, Civil law of Russia. Essays on theory. M.: UNITY-DANA, 2006.
I. A. Pokrovsky, Decree. Moscow: op., 2001.
V. I. Sinaisky, Russian civil law. Moscow, 2002.
I. A. Pokrovsky, The main problems of civil law. Moscow, 2001.
G. F. Shershenevich, General theory of law, vol. 1. Moscow, 1910.
Y. S. Gambarov, Civil law. General part. Moscow, 2003.
D. A. Kerimov, Problems of the general theory of law and the state: in 3 volumes, vol. 1. M., 2001.
Y. C. Chang, “Drawing the legal family tree: An empirical comparative study of 170 dimensions of property law in 129 jurisdictions,” Journal of Legal Analysis, vol. 13, no. 1. pp. 127–178, 2021. doi: 10.1093/jla/laaa004.
D. A. Loginova, “Institutional issues of sustainable development in rural areas of Russia,” Public Administration Issues, vol. 2019, no. 2. pp. 115–140, 2019.
E. Lemon, “Authoritarian legal harmonization in the post-Soviet space,” Democratization, vol. 27, no. 7. pp. 1221–1239, 2020. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2020.1778671.
M. Livson, “IMPACT OF DIGITALIZATION ON LEGAL REGULATION: FORMATION OF NEW LEGAL PRACTICES,” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, vol. 9, no. 2. 2021. doi: 10.37497/REVCAMPOJUR.V9I2.749.
A. Aslund, “Economic causes of crime in Russia,” The Rule of Law and Economic Reform in Russia. pp. 79–94, 2019. doi: 10.4324/9780429495878-5.
Y. Prytyka, “LEGAL CHALLENGES FOR UKRAINE UNDER MARTIAL LAW: PROTECTION OF CIVIL, PROPERTY AND LABOUR RIGHTS, RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, AND ENFORCEMENT OF DECISIONS,” Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, vol. 5, no. 3. pp. 219–238, 2022. doi: 10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-n000329.
V. V. Gushchin, “State regulation of entrepreneurial activity in Russia,” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, vol. 12, no. 4. pp. 1331–1336, 2020. doi: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP4/20201610.
G. Ajani, “The rise and fall of the law-based state in the experience of Russian legal scholarship: Foreign patterns and domestic style,” Toward the Rule of Law in Russia: Political and Legal Reform in the Transition Period. pp. 3–21, 2019. doi: 10.4324/9781315486451-2.
E. B. Zavyalova, “Smart Contracts in the Russian Transaction Regulation,” Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 129. pp. 205–212, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47945-9_22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Web of Scholars: Multidimensional Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
